|
The
Constitution Party: HISTORY
1992 A coalition of independent state parties united to form the U.S. Taxpayers
Party. The party’s founder, Howard Phillips, was on the ballot in 21 states as
its first presidential candidate.
1995-99 Federal Election Commission recognition as a national party (only 5
FEC recognized parties.) Ballot access achieved in 39 states for the 1996
elections, representing over 80% of the electoral college votes available.
Name changed to “Constitution Party” by delegates at the 1999
National Convention to better reflect the party’s primary focus of enforcing the
U.S. Constitution’s provisions and limitations.
2000 & 2004 The party achieved ballot access in 41 and 36 states
respectively. Even though the party was on fewer state ballots in 2004, the vote
tally increased by 40% compared to the 2000 elections while other ‘alternative’
parties lost ground or barely matched their 2000 vote totals.
NUMBERS
The CP is the third largest political party in terms of voter registration.
There are 367,000 registered Constitution Party voters. (This number does not
take into account the many states which do not tally voter registrations by
party. In addition, hundreds of thousands of voters registered with other
parties have chosen to vote for Constitution Party candidates at the national,
state and local levels.)
1/4 of all voters nation-wide are registered as independent or as members
of a ‘third party’. Over the last 10 years this has been the largest growing
segment of voter registrations. Some states’ third party or independent
registrations approach 1/3 of all registered voters.
In 2008, the Constitution Party expects to have ballot access in all 50
states.
CANDIDATES
November, 2006 the Constitution Party had 193 candidates on the ballot,
including 6 U.S. Senate candidates. CP candidates were elected to partisan
offices for the first time in 2006, including Montana State Representative Rick
Jore.
PLATFORM
The Constitution Party is the only party which is completely:
Pro-Life
Pro-States’ Rights
Pro-Second Amendment
Pro-Constitutional, Limited Government
Against- illegal immigration and open borders
Against- U.S. policy being dictated by the United Nations
Against- undeclared unconstitutional wars (such as Iraq and Afghanistan)
Against- free trade and all international trade agreements such as NAFTA & GATT
WHY A THIRD PARTY?
1. To encourage voter participation and citizen involvement in the governing
process.
2. Competition yields a Superior Product; i.e. better elected officials and
better government.
· 95% of all incumbent candidates win
re-election. In recent years, between 50 and 75 of incumbent Congressmen in the
U.S. did not face an opponent on the November ballot, allowing them to be
reelected without even campaigning.
· Voter choice is even more limited in
state legislative races. 35 to 40% of the 6900 seats in state houses across the
US (over 2500 seats) typically have no competition.
3. To address issues ignored by the two parties in power.
Past third parties championed…
· A Woman’s Right to Vote
-introduced in 1872 by the Prohibition Party. It wasn’t until 1916 that the two
political parties in power began to consider the issue.
· Abolition of Slavery-introduced
by the Liberty Party (1840/1844) The issue was not fully accepted by the
Republican Party even as late as 1860. The Republican Party was itself a third
party in 1854 when it was founded. Just a few years later, the Republicans
defeated the incumbent conservative party, the Whigs, by running a man named
Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln, running in a four-way race, won the electoral college
and the presidency even though he wasn't on the ballot in nine states and
received less that 40% of the popular vote.
· A Balanced Budget- focus of
Independent/Reform Party (1992/1996) candidate Ross Perot who campaigned for
fiscal restraint. By the time George W. Bush became president the budget was
balanced. Today both parties give strong lip service to ending deficit spending
though neither party is willing to make the tough political choices needed to
balance the budget.
IS AMERICA READY?
In a May 2007
Rasmussen survey 58% of Americans said it would be good for the United
States to have a “truly competitive” third party. Voters are now weighing
their options, especially on the issue of immigration. According to
Rasmussen, 35% of conservatives said they'd pick a third party candidate
over a Republican.
http://www.constitutionparty.com
COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR
Mary Starrett 602.315.6193
mstarrett@constitutionparty.com

|